What is required: Essay on mid-day meal or free education

Although India is moving towards development in the 21st century, many areas of the country still need the necessary resources. Even today, people in rural India need to be motivated for education from time to time. Some villages are so backward in terms of development that their lives are spent on arranging only two meals a day. Even today, people in such areas do not value education.

To know this fact, read the following essay in full, I hope this essay will be useful for you:

Do we need lunch in the 21st century or do we need lunch or free education in the 21st century?Century in Hindi)

Free food or education – 1200 word essay

Preface (Why do we need free meals or free education)

Whether you are talking about today’s 21st century or past centuries, if you are asked what it takes to survive before food or education, your answer will be the same as that of people in backward rural areas. But today this question is being asked from the point of view of development in view of the present times, which includes all sections of the country. Mid Day Meal and Free Education are two different schemes to attract children to education, the usefulness of which we will discuss today.

What is lunch? (What is lunch?)

Mid-day Meal was first introduced in 1925 as a mid-day meal program in Tamil Nadu. Lunch was then introduced in primary schools in a district of Tamil Nadu with the aim of increasing the number of children going to school. The then Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu K. Kamaraj (K. Kamaraj) implemented this scheme first in Chennai and then in the entire state. Thus Tamil Nadu became the first state in the country to start lunch.

In 2001, the Supreme Court ordered all states to implement the scheme within six months. Earlier, the then President Hon’ble Pranab Mukherjee had launched a mid-day meal scheme in schools run by the central government. On 15 August 1994, the Government of India launched the National Program for Nutrition Assistance for Primary Education. In October 2007, the scheme was also launched for upper primary classes from 6 to 8 in 3479 educationally backward groups.

See free education plan (See free education plan)

The right to free and compulsory education for children has been in the Indian Parliament since August 4, 2009. Article 21A of the Constitution of India provides free education to children between the ages of 6 and 14 in India. After the enactment of this Act on April 1, 2010, India became one of the 135 countries to make education a fundamental right. Under the 86th Amendment of 2002, education was included in Article 21A as a fundamental right.

In the context of this bill, a draft was introduced in 2005 in which the government was embroiled in much controversy over making it mandatory to reserve 25% seats for economically backward children in private schools. The Act was passed on April 1, 2010 in all parts of the country except Jammu and Kashmir. On May 7, 2014, the Supreme Court of India ruled that the Right to Education Act would not apply to minority institutions.

Which is more important, lunch or free education? (Which is more important, lunch or free education?)

Even in the 21st century, the mentality of the economically and educationally backward seems to be very different when it comes to education. People still consider education useless and parents who understand the importance of education are busy with their livelihood with them. Even children in such communities are not interested in education. In view of this, plans like mid-day meal were introduced so that the children would go to school under the pretext of food and the children’s food anxiety would be lessened by the parents of those children. Parents who cannot afford to feed their children also get a lot of help from this scheme.

On the other hand, if we talk about free education scheme, at present the government has implemented this scheme only for children of 6 to 10 years. Even today it is difficult for many parents to spend on their children’s education. The free education scheme has helped such parents a lot. Parents who are unable to send their children to school due to their low income also get the opportunity to go to school with the help of this scheme. Getting basic education up to 8th standard is most important for the future of children, as it is the best time for their intellectual development.

If you want to choose one of the two most important schemes, I think it is wrong to go both ways because without food and education without food can not imagine a better future for children. If children get a nutritious diet and do not get education, they may not be able to do anything in the field of education, but they will certainly be able to do something in other fields like sports etc. At the same time, the future of children cannot be secured even with a nutritious diet. It is equally important to educate children for their bright future and to provide free education to the financially weak. In the end, we all come to the same conclusion that economically and educationally backward people need both these schemes equally.

Are the needy getting the benefit of lunch or free education? (Are the needy getting the benefit of lunch or free education?)

According to government figures, there are 120 million children in India out of a total of 12,56,000 schools. The plan to provide them with facilities like lunch and free education is in the form of the largest scheme in the world. The government that comes every 5 years gives promises to the people, but as promised, are the needy getting facilities like lunch and free education? Are the people in the community who are in dire need of these facilities getting the benefit of nutritious food and free education in schools? The government cannot turn away from responsibility just by bringing a plan, the more important task than the plan is to reach the needy, which the government has to fulfill.

The politics behind lunch and free education (The politics behind lunch and free education)

No matter what the government is, everyone has the same intention that the people should vote for them. The government first drafts the plan so that people can vote happily and then after winning the election, the government itself gets caught up in the whirlpool of protests and rejects it. She wins the election by promising to give all the children good food in the form of lunch, but then the larvae and dead rats come out at the same lunch. They have won elections by claiming to provide free education, but fees are collected from parents in the name of various programs and extracurricular activities.

Conclusion

Nutritious food for the physical development of any child and education for intellectual development is extremely important. The future of children depends heavily on these two factors. Therefore, along with the government, parents should also do their utmost to provide nutrition and education to their children. Children should also be given free education and food where necessary so that no child is left behind in the race for development.

Frequently Asked Questions: Frequently Asked Questions

Question 1 – When did lunch start?

Answer – In 1925, the first lunch was started in Tamil Nadu.

Question 2 – How many children are there under the mid-day meal scheme?

Answer – A total of 120 million children are served lunch.

Question 3 – When did the Free and Compulsory Education Bill come into force?

Answer – The Free and Compulsory Education Bill came into force in 2009.

Question 4 – Who started the mid-day meal in the school under the Central Government?

Answer – The luncheon was inaugurated by the then President Pranab Mukherjee at a centrally run school.

Question 5-Which country has the largest luncheon in the world?

Answer – India has the largest luncheon in the world.

Leave a Comment